गुरुवार, 4 मार्च 2010

Applications under s. 482 Cr.P.C.

Here is the list of orders of Lower Court/ Magistrate against which applications are normally filed before the High Court under s. 482 Cr.P.C. . These applications are brought under following category code :

401510 order under Sections 110/111 Cr.P.C. for quashing of notice
401511 order under Sections 107/116 Cr.P.C.
401512 order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for maintenance
401513 order under Section 126 Cr.P.C.
401514 order under Section 127 Cr.P.C. for alteration of maintenance
401515 order under Section 128 Cr.P.C. for enforcement of order of maintenance
401516 order under Section 133 Cr.P.C. for removal of nuisance
401517 order under Section 145 Cr.P.C. before filing revision
401518 order under Section 145 Cr.P.C. after filing revision
401519 order under Section 145(8) Cr.P.C. for custody or sale of crops
401520 order under Section 146 Cr.P.C. before filing revision
401521 order under Section 146 Cr.P.C. after filing revision
401522 order under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., to quash the order for investigation
401523 order summoning accused in a complaint case without filing revision
401524 order summoning accused in a complaint case after filing revision
401525 order summoning accused after rejecting final report without filing revision
401526 order summoning accused after rejecting final report after filing revision
401527 for quashing of charge sheet
401528 for quashing of investigation
401529 for quashing of F.I.R.
401530 against summoning order u/s 319, Cr.P.C.
401531 to dispense with the presence of accused
401532 to set aside order of commitment
401533 for stay of arrest
401534 for expeditious disposal of Bail
401535 for disposal of bail on same day
401536 for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case
401537 order under Section 203,Cr.P.C. dismissing complaint

शनिवार, 13 फ़रवरी 2010

Average marks where answer book missing

Many students become victim of negligence of Examination Board. Many times it is complained that the student had appeared in all papers and done very well in the examination but in a particular paper he has been shown absent or failed or has been awarded surprisingly low marks . In such situation, upon calling the report from the examining authority if it is revealed before the court that answer book of the student is missing and is not traceable, the court directs the examining authority to award average of marks obtained in all other papers by that student.
One of the illustrative cases is - Deep Kamal Savita v. State of UP decided on 28 August 2009 by Hon'ble Ranvijay singh, J. of Allahabad High Court.